| |
Acceptable |
Needs
Work |
| Mechanics, including tools
used, links, writing and navigation |
- Tools used to create the presentation match and
content and purpose
- All links work properly
- Writing is virtually error-free
- Site is easy to navigate
|
- Tools used to create the presentation confict with
content and/or purpose
- Some or many links are broken
- Writing contains noticeable errors
- Site is difficult to navigate
|
| Visual style |
- Visual style complements or enhances the content
|
- Visual style detracts from the content
|
| Integration |
- Rationale for including artifacts is adequate or
superior
- Links are made among included artifacts
|
- Rationale for including works is inadequate or absent
- Included works are not interlinked
|
| Reflection |
- Reflection about artifacts and links is included and
is adequate or superior
|
- Reflection about artifacts and links is absent,
superficial or unrelated to content
|
| Link theory/research to
practice |
- Evidence of connections between theory/research and
practice is suitably demonstrated
|
- Evidence of connections between theory/research and
practice is absent or weak
|